[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071018105601.27d96f7e.kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:56:01 -0700
From: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@...el.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, greg@...ah.com,
pcihpd-discuss@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix two PEIe hotplug issues
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 13:49:25 -0400
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 10:06:14AM -0700, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> > No, it actually does violate the spec. Feel free to read it yourself.
> > We are not supposed to do Native PCIe without first successfully executing
> > OSC. Period. If you do, you are violating the spec.
>
> To be fair, we have violated the spec before in order to get crappy
> hardware or to work around crappy ACPI implementations.
> acpi_sleep=s3_bios for example violates the spec, but yet it is the
> only way to get certain laptops to suspend/resume correctly.
>
> The question to ask is whether violating the spec will lead to (a) a
> potential system hang/crash, (b) data corruption, (c) physical harm to
> the device/laptop.
>
> Regards,
>
> - Ted
>
And the answer is most definitely yes to at least a) and c) on specific
hardware I know about.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists