[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071019161700.GA19254@grex.cyberspace.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:17:00 -0400
From: Roopesh <roopesh@...erspace.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: MMC: CRC Errors with 2GB cards
Hi,
I am seeing a lot of CRC errors happening with CMD25 on a couple
of Transcend 2GB cards (specifiation version 1.1). However, if
I apply the following patch, I see no errors being reported
--- linux-2.6.22/drivers/mmc/card/block.c 2007-09-27 14:59:44.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-tao/drivers/mmc/card/block.c 2007-10-19 20:53:52.000000000 +0530
@@ -298,6 +298,7 @@
}
if (rq_data_dir(req) != READ) {
+ /* Wait for the card to to be in transfer state*/
do {
int err;
@@ -310,8 +311,8 @@
req->rq_disk->disk_name, err);
goto cmd_err;
}
- } while (!(cmd.resp[0] & R1_READY_FOR_DATA));
-
+ } while (!(R1_CURRENT_STATE(cmd.resp[0]) == 4));
+
#if 0
if (cmd.resp[0] & ~0x00000900)
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: status = %08x\n",
I noticed that at times the card is not actually in transfer
state when it recieves the second consecutive
MULTIPLE_BLOCK_WRITE cmd. As per the simplified specification
available, all class 4 commands including CMD25 can be issued
only in tra state, though its also specified that READY_FOR_DATA
indicates whether the card can accept new data.
I am just wondering if I have set of broken cards. Any pointers
in this regard?
Thanks and Regards,
Roopesh.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists