linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 9/9] RT: Only dirty a cacheline if the priority is actually changing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47196C9B.7090909@tiscali.nl>
Date:	Sat, 20 Oct 2007 04:48:59 +0200
From:	Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl>
To:	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
CC:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] RT: Only dirty a cacheline if the priority is actually
 changing

Gregory Haskins wrote:
> We can avoid dirtying a rq related cacheline with a simple check, so why not.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
> ---
> 
>  0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

I think you wanted a patch here?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/