[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0710200353270.12737@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 03:54:39 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl>
cc: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] RT: Only dirty a cacheline if the priority is actually
changing
--
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007, Roel Kluin wrote:
> Gregory Haskins wrote:
> > We can avoid dirtying a rq related cacheline with a simple check, so why not.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
> > ---
> >
> > 0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> I think you wanted a patch here?
>
But it is here. Gregory is a Zen master, and this patch does exactly what
he wanted it to do.
-- Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists