lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200710202305.l9KN5R0i008618@agora.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 19:05:27 -0400 From: Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: what to call it after 2.6.23 but before 2.6.24-rc1? In message <alpine.LFD.0.999.0710201517530.10525@...dy.linux-foundation.org>, Linus Torvalds writes: > On Sat, 20 Oct 2007, Erez Zadok wrote: [...] > - if you are a git user, and got it that way, just use the git name, and > use "git describe" to get it. > > So my current head is called "v2.6.23-6562-g8add244" which tells you > three things: > (a) it's based on 2.6.23 > (b) there's been 6562 commits since 2.6.23 > (c) the top-of-tree abbreviated commit is "8add244". Bingo. git-describe is what I was looking for. It's more accurate to use as a reference even after rcN come out. My current cloned tree of yours sez: v2.6.23-6562-g8add244 One more small git question: I keep a separate tree for unionfs, which I rebase often based on your tree. But my tree sez: $ git-describe v2.6.21-rc1-22880-g3a1848d "v2.6.21-rc1"? What am I missing (some tags I forgot to pull?) Why isn't git-describe saying that I'm based on your latest tree? Thanks, Erez. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists