linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] irq_flags_t: intro and core annotations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 21 Oct 2007 01:54:18 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc:	torvalds@...l.org, akpm@...l.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] irq_flags_t: intro and core annotations

On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 03:55:46AM +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> * irq_flags_t is marked with __bitwise__ which means sparse(1) will warn
>   developer when he accidently uses wrong type or totally wrong variable.
> * irq_flags_t allows conversion to struct instead of typedef without flag day.
>   This will give compile-time breakage of buggy users later.
> * irq_flags_t allows arch maintainers to eventually switch to something
>   smaller than "unsigned long" if they want to.

> P.S.: Anyone checking for differences in sparse logs -- don't panic,
> 	just remove __bitwise__ .

Umm...  Could you make that conditional on something, so that it could
be done with e.g. -D__CHECK_IRQFLAGS__?  We could make that unconditional
closer to the end of conversion.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/