linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] m68k: Use cc-cross-prefix (was: Re: [GI:wqT PULL] kbuild updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.0.9999.0710220303400.27496@firda.kolla.no>
Date:	Mon, 22 Oct 2007 03:07:19 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Kolbjørn Barmen <linux-m68k@...la.no>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
cc:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: Use cc-cross-prefix (was: Re: [GI:wqT PULL] kbuild
 updates - second round)

On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> +ifneq ($(SUB_ARCH),$(ARCH))
> +     ifeq ($(CROSS_COMPILE),)
> +            CROSS_COMPILE := $(call cc-cross-prefix, m68k-linux-gnu- m68k-linux-)

I've not paid much attention to discussion over this (I tend to build
natively, less stress :) ), so pardon my ignorance. Does the above make
any difference for me when I use CROSS_COMPILE=m68k-unknown-linux-gnu-,
or does it just detect m68k-linux-gnu- and m68k-linux-?

-- kolla, that gentoo/m68k lunatic :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/