lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710220915160.6155@anakin> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 09:16:27 +0200 (CEST) From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> To: Kolbjørn Barmen <linux-m68k@...la.no> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, linux arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: Use cc-cross-prefix (was: Re: [GI:wqT PULL] kbuild updates - second round) On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Kolbjørn Barmen wrote: > On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > +ifneq ($(SUB_ARCH),$(ARCH)) > > + ifeq ($(CROSS_COMPILE),) > > + CROSS_COMPILE := $(call cc-cross-prefix, m68k-linux-gnu- m68k-linux-) > > I've not paid much attention to discussion over this (I tend to build > natively, less stress :) ), so pardon my ignorance. Does the above make > any difference for me when I use CROSS_COMPILE=m68k-unknown-linux-gnu-, > or does it just detect m68k-linux-gnu- and m68k-linux-? No, it makes no difference if you explicitly pass CROSS_COMPILE=m68k-unknown-linux-gnu-. If you want, we can add m68k-unknown-linux-gnu- to the list in arch/m68k/Makefile, so it cab be autodetected. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists