[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6599ad830710230941y5d175688ob3a4d9ac42ba8c8f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:41:49 -0700
From: "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
To: vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Srivatsa Vaddagiri" <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] CFS CGroup: Report usage
On 10/23/07, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Adds a cpu.usage file to the CFS cgroup that reports CPU usage in
> > milliseconds for that cgroup's tasks
>
> It would be nice to split this into user and sys time at some point.
Sounds reasonable - but does CFS track this?
> We have also received request to provide idle time for a
> container/cgroup.
The semantics of "idle time" for a cgroup on a shared system seem a
bit fuzzy. How would you define it?
Suppose you have two cgroups that would each want to use, say, 55% of
a CPU - technically they should each be regarded as having 45% idle
time, but if they run on a the same CPU the chances are that they will
both always have some processes on their runqueue due to contention
with the other group. So how would you measure the difference between
this and a cgroup that really is trying to use 100%?
Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists