[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1193156487.26974.39.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:21:27 -0400
From: Adam Jackson <ajax@...hat.com>
To: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add eeprom_bad_csum_allow module option to e1000.
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 09:18 -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
> Adam Jackson wrote:
> > When the EEPROM gets corrupted, you can fix it with ethtool, but only if
> > the module loads and creates a network device. But, without this option,
> > if the EEPROM is corrupted, the driver will not create a network device.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@...hat.com>
>
> NAK
>
> wrong list, not sent to me, and while for e100 I was OK with this patch, for e1000
> it really does not make sense to 'just allow' a bad checksum - if your eeprom is
> randomly messed up then you cannot just fix it like this anyway.
That's strange, I managed to recover an otherwise horked e1000 with it.
What should I have done instead?
- ajax
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists