lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <471E766F.7020203@zytor.com>
Date:	Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:32:15 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC:	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v7 1/3] x86 boot: setup data

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> No, he doesn't.  The boot protocol version is communication between
>> the boot loader and the kernel (specifically, it is communication FROM
>> the kernel TO the bootloader), not between internal bits of the
>> kernel.  Th
> 
> So the bootloader will only fill out fields the kernel claims to understand?
> 

Correct.  If it fails to respect this restriction, it might even 
overwrite kernel code.  To make the bootloader's job easier, we have 
retconned the jump instruction at the beginning of the header to also be 
a limit marker.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ