lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1193187847.23935.95.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:04:07 +0800 From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com> To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -v7 0/3] x86 boot: 32-bit boot protocol On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 15:06 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Huang, Ying wrote: > > This patch set defines a 32-bit boot protocol for x86 platform, adds > > an extensible boot parameter passing mechanism, export the boot > > parameters via sysfs. > > > > The patch set has been tested against kernel of git version > > v2.6.23-6623-g55b70a0 (with Rusty's git tree pulled) on x86_64 and > > i386. > > > > This patch set is based on the proposal of Peter Anvin. > > > > Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> > > This patchset should spend a cycle in -mm before being merged, though. Do you think it is possible that the 3rd patch of the patchset: document for 32 bit boot protocol can be merged into upstream firstly? It has been used by kexec/LinuxBIOS already and the EFI support patches depend on it too. Best Regards, Huang Ying - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists