linux-kernel - Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071023220649.5a76af82@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date:	Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:06:49 -0700
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>,
	Thomas Fricaccia <thomas_fricacci@...oo.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]

On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:31:28 -0700
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:

> Chris Wright wrote:
> > Yes, and I think we can still improve performance although I can't
> > see anyway to help out the modular case, so I guess it will have to
> > incur the hit that's always been there.  
> 
> Broaden the paravirt patching machinery?
> 

so far I've something much simpler in mind, I have a first prototype
and it shows code that is pretty much optimal on modern cpus.

I hope to have something postable in a week or so
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/