[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55615.simon.1193226629@5ec7c279.invalid>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:50:29 +0100
From: "Simon Arlott" <simon@...e.lp0.eu>
To: "Chris Wright" <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
"Jan Engelhardt" <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Andreas Gruenbacher" <agruen@...e.de>,
"Thomas Fricaccia" <thomas_fricacci@...oo.com>,
"Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org>,
"James Morris" <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Crispin Cowan" <crispin@...spincowan.com>,
"Giacomo Catenazzi" <cate@...ian.org>,
"Alan Cox" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static
interface
I currently have an LSM that only handles permissions for socket_bind
and socket_listen, I load it and then "capability" as secondary on
boot - but now I can't because the LSM framework is now just the LS
framework.
Why can't this "static LSM" change be a Kconfig option?
(I don't want to have to maintain my own reverted copy of security/,
or compile this into the kernel because then I can't ever modify and
reload it without rebooting.)
--
Simon Arlott
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists