lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20071023.180744.115914004.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:07:44 -0700 (PDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: jeff@...zik.org Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davej@...hat.com, auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com, ajax@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000, e1000e valid-addr fixes From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:03:36 -0400 > I'm wondering if there is a way to avoid adding > > if (!is_valid_ether_addr(dev->dev_addr)) > return -EINVAL; > > to every ethernet driver's ->open() hook. The first idea I get is: 1) Create netdev->validate_dev_addr(). 2) If it exists, invoke it before ->open(), abort and return if any errors signaled. etherdev init hooks up a function that does the above check, which allows us to avoid editing every ethernet driver What do you think? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists