[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071024083514.GA15451@in.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:05:14 +0530
From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] Remove CPU_DEAD/CPU_UP_CANCELLED handling from workqueue.c
Hello Rusty,
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:21:04PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 October 2007 15:37:16 Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> > @@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ static void start_workqueue_thread(struc
> >
> > if (p != NULL) {
> > if (cpu >= 0)
> > - kthread_bind(p, cpu);
> > + set_cpus_allowed(p, cpumask_of_cpu(cpu));
> > wake_up_process(p);
> > }
>
> Hi Gautham!
>
> This works, although the change is unnecessary.
This change was necessary because once a cpu goes offline, the worker
threads for that particular cpu, sleep with their state being
TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE. Thus, during CPU_ONLINE, when we call
start_workqueue_thread(), kthread_bind() yells since the worker thread
is not TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE.
Probably later on when Oleg plans to re-introduce the ->should_stop
flag, we can put the worker threads to uninterruptible sleep, and revert
back to kthread_bind().
> If you're going to
> do this I'd prefer "if (set_cpus_allowed(p, cpumask_of_cpu(cpu)) != 0)
> BUG();".
Not sure if this is required. set_cpus_allowed() returns a non-zero
value only if the cpumask passed doesn't intersect with the cpu-online
map. In our case, start_workqueue_thread() is called only when the cpu
is online. i.e
a) __create_workqueue_key() calls start_workqueue_thread() with
get_online_cpus() protection only for those cpus which are online.
b) workqueue_cpu_callback() calls start_workqueue_thread() on event
of a CPU_ONLINE.
>
> Cheers,
> Rusty.
Thanks and Regards
gautham.
--
Gautham R Shenoy
Linux Technology Center
IBM India.
"Freedom comes with a price tag of responsibility, which is still a bargain,
because Freedom is priceless!"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists