linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0710240814340.30120@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
cc:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	mingo@...e.hu, Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout



On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > 
> > As it no longer sets the page only, perhaps it's a good idea to rename
> > sg_set_page() to sg_set()?
> 
> sg_set_buf() also sets length and offset, sg_set_page() is just a mirror
> of that. So I'd prefer to keep the naming.

I agree. And it's not like you can get it wrong, since if you only give 
the "page" argument, the preprocessor will complain loudly.

I think "sg_set_x()" is now rather logical - we fill in the SG entry 
(entirely), and the only question is _how_ we do it (which is what "x" 
says - using a page, or a kernel buffer).

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/