linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.24-rc1 fails with lockup and BUG:

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071024164445.GA6452@nineveh.local>
Date:	Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:44:46 -0400
From:	Joseph Fannin <jfannin@...il.com>
To:	Romano Giannetti <romanol@...omillas.es>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc1 fails with lockup and BUG:

On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 03:25:44PM +0200, Romano Giannetti wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> 2.6.23-rc1 fails for me. I have the sensation it is network-related, but
> I am not sure, so I send this message just to the list.
> This same failure was present in git-5734-gd85714d, I sent
> a message to the list but it seems it never arrived. I hope this will
> pass through. My system is a toshiba satellite A305-S5077, dual core pentium.
>
> The symptoms are quite strange. At boot, NetworkManager fails to activate
> my eth0 (r8169). Just stopping/restarting NM will make it works.


Denis V. Lunev wrote a patch for the NetworkManager thing a day or two
ago (which DaveM has queued).

Since netlink is involved in the traces you sent, this might do something
for the other too.

The patch I recieved follows:


> Revert to original netlink behavior. Do not reply with ACK if the
> netlink dump has bees successfully started.

> libnl has been broken by the cd40b7d3983c708aabe3d3008ec64ffce56d33b0
> The following command reproduce the problem:
>    /nl-route-get 192.168.1.1

> Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@...nvz.org>



diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
index 98e313e..44a8b41 100644
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
@@ -1565,7 +1565,10 @@ int netlink_dump_start(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb,
 
 	netlink_dump(sk);
 	sock_put(sk);
-	return 0;
+
+	/* We successfully started a dump, by returning -EINTR we
+	 * signal not to send ACK even if it was requested */
+	return -EINTR;
 }
 
 void netlink_ack(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, int err)
@@ -1619,17 +1622,21 @@ int netlink_rcv_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, int (*cb)(struct sk_buff *,
 
 		/* Only requests are handled by the kernel */
 		if (!(nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_REQUEST))
-			goto skip;
+			goto ack;
 
 		/* Skip control messages */
 		if (nlh->nlmsg_type < NLMSG_MIN_TYPE)
-			goto skip;
+			goto ack;
 
 		err = cb(skb, nlh);
-skip:
+		if (err == -EINTR)
+			goto skip;
+
+ack:
 		if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_ACK || err)
 			netlink_ack(skb, nlh, err);
 
+skip:
 	        msglen = NLMSG_ALIGN(nlh->nlmsg_len);
 		if (msglen > skb->len)
 			msglen = skb->len;





--
Joseph Fannin
jfannin@...il.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/