lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.0.9999.0710260235130.8261@chino.kir.corp.google.com> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 02:42:30 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...ru> cc: torvalds@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] De-constify sched.h On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > 2) There is no such thing as const task_struct. Anyone who think otherwise > deserves compiler warning. > A 'const struct task_struct *' can be used as an annotation to mean that no member of the struct is modified through that pointer, so it's perfectly acceptable to qualify formals in that manner. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists