lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:25:48 -0400
From:	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Fix linux/swap.h build wart

For some time, there has been a problem of linux/swap.h using
page_cache_release and release_pages without declaring them by
including linux/pagemap.h.  pagemap.h isn't included because that
breaks the sparc build.

The full details are in the next post, but the short story is that
sparc's pgtable.h includes linux/swap.h, creating a mm.h -> mm.h
recursion.  The current tree breaks that recursion by removing the
swap.h -> pagemap.h inclusion.  This breaks builds on a regular basis
(references also in the next post).

These patches propose to break the recursion instead by removing the
linux/pagemap.h -> linux/highmem.h inclusion.  I'd like to know
whether there are any fundamental reasons that this include should be
preserved.

The reason for choosing this include is that pagemap.h doesn't use
anything exported by highmem.h.  The downside is that a bunch of
things now need to include highmem.h.  These are mostly filesystems,
plus a good amount of arch code and a few drivers.  I would argue that
if you use something from a header, you should include it, regardless
of whether you already get the header indirectly, so this isn't too
much of a downside as far as I'm concerned.

The one thing I'm uncertain about is whether pagemap.h and highmem.h
have some basic relationship that implies that you can assume you get
highmem when you include pagemap.

The two patches that follow do the following:
	remove highmem.h from pagemap.h and add includes of highmem.h
to a number of files that now need them
	include pagemap.h in swap.h

These are for comment only, not for mainline, so there's no S-o-b
right yet.

At this point, I haven't confirmed that the following files, which use
stuff from highmem.h but don't include it, still build:

	./arch/x86/kernel/crash_dump_64.c
	./arch/frv/mm/fault.c
	./arch/frv/mm/kmap.c
	./arch/h8300/mm/kmap.c
	./arch/ia64/kernel/crash_dump.c
	./arch/m68k/mm/kmap.c
	./arch/m68knommu/mm/kmap.c
	./arch/powerpc/kernel/crash_dump.c
	./arch/sh/kernel/crash_dump.c
	./arch/xtensa/mm/pgtable.c
	./drivers/block/ps3disk.c
	./drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_verbs.h
	./drivers/mmc/host/at91_mci.c
	./drivers/mmc/host/mmci.h
	./drivers/mmc/host/mmc_spi.c
	./drivers/s390/block/xpram.c
	./drivers/s390/char/tape_34xx.c
	./drivers/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
	./fs/hfsplus/hfsplus_fs.h
	./include/asm-arm/cacheflush.h
	./include/asm-frv/pgtable.h
	./include/asm-x86/kexec_32.h
	./include/asm-x86/kexec_64.h
	./include/asm-x86/pgtable_32.h
	./include/asm-m68k/motorola_pgalloc.h
	./include/asm-m68k/sun3_pgalloc.h
	./include/asm-m68k/sun3_pgtable.h
	./include/asm-mips/cacheflush.h
	./include/asm-mips/page.h
	./include/asm-parisc/cacheflush.h
	./include/asm-powerpc/pgtable-ppc32.h
	./include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h
	./include/asm-s390/kexec.h
	./include/asm-sh/kexec.h
	./mm/migrate.c

				Jeff

-- 
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ