[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1193431149.5032.60.camel@localhost>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:39:09 -0400
From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Cc: rientjes@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ak@...e.de,
clameter@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] cpusets: add memory_spread_user option
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 10:54 -0700, Paul Jackson wrote:
> > Will it handle the case of MPOL_INTERLEAVE policy on a shm segment that
> > is mapped by tasks in different, possibly disjoint, cpusets. Local
> > allocation does, and my patch does. That was one of the primary
> > goals--to address an issue that Christoph has with shared policies.
> > cpusets really muck these up!
>
> It probably won't handle that. I don't get along too well with shmem.
Not surprising :). shmem doesn't get along too well with cpusets.
>
> Can you to an anti-shmem bigot how MPOL_INTERLEAVE should work with
^ explain ?
> shmem segments mapped in diverse ways by different tasks in different
> cpusets? What would be the key attribute(s) of a proper solution?
> Maybe if we keep it simple enough, I can avoid mucking it up too much
> this time around.
Personally, I'm of the opinion "if it hurts when you do that, don't do
that". I have uses for shared memory and mempolicies on the same, but
they don't involve sharing shmem [nor mapped files] between cpusets nor
dynamically changing cpusets. So, my approach would be to document the
issues clearly [another reason I'd like to see cpuset man pages] and
make sure that folks can't accidentally trip over them. But, I suppose
all the documentation in the world won't stop some people from hurting
themselves. As my grandmother used to tell me, "children and fools
shouldn't play with sharp tools." [Then she'd always ask me, "Which one
are you?" I guess time has answered that question...]
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists