linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix bad data from non-direct-io read after direct-io write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:34:24 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Karl Schendel <kschendel@...allegro.com>,
	Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
	Leonid Ananiev <leonid.i.ananiev@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix bad data from non-direct-io read after direct-io
 write


Hmm. If I read this right, this bug seems to have been introduced by 
commit 65b8291c4000e5f38fc94fb2ca0cb7e8683c8a1b ("dio: invalidate clean 
pages before dio write") back in March.

Before that, we'd call invalidate_inode_pages2_range() unconditionally 
after the call mapping->a_ops->direct_IO() if it was a write and there 
were cached pages in the mapping (well, "unconditionally" in the sense 
that it didn't depend on the return value of the ->direct_IO() call).

However, with both the old and the new code _and_ with your patch, the 
return code - in case the invalidate failed - was corrupted. So we may 
actually end up doing some IO, but then returning the "wrong" error code 
from the invalidate. Hmm?

Somebody who cares about direct-IO and who - unlike me - doesn't think 
it's a total and idiotic crock should think hard about this. I'm including 
Karl's email, but also an alternate patch for consideration.

And maybe some day we can all agree that direct_IO is crap and should not 
be done.

		Linus

--
diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index 5209e47..032371a 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -2510,22 +2510,17 @@ generic_file_direct_IO(int rw, struct kiocb *iocb, const struct iovec *iov,
 	}
 
 	retval = mapping->a_ops->direct_IO(rw, iocb, iov, offset, nr_segs);
-	if (retval)
+	if (retval < 0)
 		goto out;
 
 	/*
 	 * Finally, try again to invalidate clean pages which might have been
 	 * faulted in by get_user_pages() if the source of the write was an
 	 * mmap()ed region of the file we're writing.  That's a pretty crazy
-	 * thing to do, so we don't support it 100%.  If this invalidation
-	 * fails and we have -EIOCBQUEUED we ignore the failure.
+	 * thing to do, so we don't support it 100%.
 	 */
-	if (rw == WRITE && mapping->nrpages) {
-		int err = invalidate_inode_pages2_range(mapping,
-					      offset >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT, end);
-		if (err && retval >= 0)
-			retval = err;
-	}
+	if (rw == WRITE && mapping->nrpages)
+		invalidate_inode_pages2_range(mapping, offset >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT, end);
 out:
 	return retval;
 }

On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Karl Schendel wrote:
>
> This patch fixes a race between direct IO writes and non-direct IO
> reads on the same file.  The symptom is a stale file page seen by
> any non-direct-IO reader, which persists until the page is invalidated
> somehow (e.g. page rewritten again, or memory pressure, or reboot).
> 
> An improper return test caused direct-IO's after-write page invalidations
> to be skipped.  If we're writing page N, and the reader is reading
> page N-x for small x, and the read code decides to readahead, it's
> not too hard to cause a race that leaves an old, stale copy of the
> page in the page cache.  Retval is usually +nonzero after the
> mapping->a_ops->direct_IO call!
> 
> Signed-off-by: Karl Schendel <kschendel@...allegro.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> By the way, I agree that the userland situation is stupid, and I'm
> addressing that in the application (happens to be the Ingres DBMS).
> However, the kernel shouldn't compound the stupidity.
> 
> I'll try to watch for replies, but it would be very useful to
> cc me at kschendel@...allegro.com if any discussion is needed;
> I'm not subscribed to lkml.
> 
> 
> --- linux-2.6.23.1-base/mm/filemap.c	2007-10-12 12:43:44.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6.23.1/mm/filemap.c	2007-10-26 16:12:08.000000000 -0400
> @@ -2194,7 +2194,7 @@ generic_file_direct_IO(int rw, struct ki
>  	}
> 
>  	retval = mapping->a_ops->direct_IO(rw, iocb, iov, offset, nr_segs);
> -	if (retval)
> +	if (retval < 0)
>  		goto out;
> 
>  	/*
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/