lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20071026143525.b9218ed7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:35:25 -0700 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: "Salyzyn, Mark" <mark_salyzyn@...ptec.com> Cc: jeff@...zik.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] irq-remove: scsi driver trivial On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:00:23 -0400 "Salyzyn, Mark" <mark_salyzyn@...ptec.com> wrote: > ACK with comment ... Please don't top-post and then include 65 kbytes of unneeded goop. > This API changed in 2.4.23 switching to irqreturn_t, and 2.6.19 dropping > the struct_pt_regs argument, this is yet another API change in the same > function. The last one came with no clues to differentiate except kernel > version (for those of us that are required to produce updated > back-ported driver modules once this patch becomes a legacy). I am > *praying* that this API change is clean across 2.6.24 and add my voice > to all to ACK this clearly! > That was a goofup. I proposed that we should add a #define TWO_ARG_IRQ_HANDLERS (or whatever) and I think I actually wrote the patch, but it got lost. I agree it would be a kind thing to do in this case. Not that I ever want to see these patches again ;) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists