linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/9] irq-remove: scsi driver trivial

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071026165035.33383e36@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date:	Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:50:35 -0700
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Salyzyn, Mark" <mark_salyzyn@...ptec.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] irq-remove: scsi driver trivial

On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:47:58 -0400
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:

> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > That was a goofup.  I proposed that we should add a #define
> > TWO_ARG_IRQ_HANDLERS (or whatever) and I think I actually wrote the
> > patch, but it got lost.
> > 
> > I agree it would be a kind thing to do in this case.

> 
> 
> Yep, I was thinking that including
> 
> 	#define IRQ_HANDLER_V3
> 
> would be a good idea.
>

it sets a certain precedent though.... we don't do this for the 500
other API changes we do each release (see stable-api-nonsense)... so
this one is mostly arbitrary picked out


-- 
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/