linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] bitops kernel-doc: inline instead of macro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 27 Oct 2007 15:30:29 +0100
From:	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bitops kernel-doc: inline instead of macro

On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 11:43:28AM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 01:48:14PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > Andy, I thought we were going to whine about __inline__ and __inline, too?
> 
> Hmmm, I don't remember that coming up, but I'll add it to the todo.  I
> am assuming plain 'inline' is preferred over both of these -- yell if
> you meant something else.

Ok, this will be in the next release and is in -next.

	WARNING: plain inline is preferred over __inline
	#4: FILE: tmp/testset-28768.c:1:
	+static __inline int foo(void)

-apw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/