[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071027104328.GA5529@shadowen.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:43:28 +0100
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, tglx@...utronix.de,
nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bitops kernel-doc: inline instead of macro
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 01:48:14PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Andy, I thought we were going to whine about __inline__ and __inline, too?
Hmmm, I don't remember that coming up, but I'll add it to the todo. I
am assuming plain 'inline' is preferred over both of these -- yell if
you meant something else.
-apw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists