linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] panic after umount (biscted)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:44:36 +0200
From:	Sebastian Siewior <lkml@...breakpoint.cc>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] panic after umount (biscted)

* Jens Axboe | 2007-10-26 13:42:30 [+0200]:

>> [2] http://download.breakpoint.cc/bug/bug_rc1_patch_reboot.jpeg 171 KiB
>
>Ah, second BUG() for same issue. Try this one. This?
>
>diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
>index 61fdaf0..57fde7b 100644
>--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
>+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
>@@ -1115,6 +1115,8 @@ static int scsi_init_io(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> 	 * kmapping pages)
> 	 */
> 	cmd->use_sg = req->nr_phys_segments;
>+	if (!cmd->use_sg)
>+		return 0;
> 
> 	/*
> 	 * If sg table allocation fails, requeue request later.
>@@ -1191,7 +1193,7 @@ int scsi_setup_blk_pc_cmnd(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct request *req)
> 	if (req->bio) {
> 		int ret;
> 
>-		BUG_ON(!req->nr_phys_segments);
>+		BUG_ON(!req->nr_phys_segments && req->bio->bi_size);
> 
> 		ret = scsi_init_io(cmd);
> 		if (unlikely(ret))
>@@ -1236,9 +1238,10 @@ int scsi_setup_fs_cmnd(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct request *req)
> 	if (ret != BLKPREP_OK)
> 		return ret;
> 	/*
>-	 * Filesystem requests must transfer data.
>+	 * Filesystem requests must transfer data, unless it's an empty
>+	 * barrier.
> 	 */
>-	BUG_ON(!req->nr_phys_segments);
>+	BUG_ON(!req->nr_phys_segments && !bio_empty_barrier(req->bio));
> 
> 	cmd = scsi_get_cmd_from_req(sdev, req);
> 	if (unlikely(!cmd))
>

I'm afraid you did not make it to the next level. I hope you have
another man :). [1] shows the result. I double checked it, it seems to
be the same bug() with the second patch.

[1] http://download.breakpoint.cc/bug/bug_patch2.jpeg 134 KiB

>Jens Axboe

Sebastian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/