[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071027072348.GA28566@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 09:23:48 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Check handling of kernel build output directory
Hi Markus.
Please do not edit cc: and to: - it is easy to miss out a mail on lkml.
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 07:07:55AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > You did it in your output directory I assume.
>
> No.
>
>
> > kbuild complains that the source directory is not clean - which
> > is what you need to clean up.
>
> I am looking for the real reasons for the occuring error messages. Let us look at another
> test example ...
>
> Sonne:~ # ls -ld /usr/src/linux
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 Oct 13 10:11 /usr/src/linux -> /usr/src/linux-2.6.23.1
> Sonne:~ # cd /usr/src/linux-2.6.23.1
> Sonne:/usr/src/linux-2.6.23.1 # unset KBUILD_OUTPUT && make mrproper && cp -p
> /boot/config-2.6.23.1-0-adjusted .config && export
> KBUILD_OUTPUT=/usr/src/obj/linux/2.6.23.1/x86_64/adjusted && rm -rf $KBUILD_OUTPUT/*
> CLEAN .config
> Sonne:/usr/src/linux-2.6.23.1 # make oldconfig && date && echo
> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX && make -j2 && echo
> YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY && make -j2 modules_install install && echo
> ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ && date
> HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep
> HOSTCC scripts/basic/docproc
> GEN /usr/src/obj/linux/2.6.23.1/x86_64/adjusted/Makefile
> HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o
> HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/kxgettext.o
> SHIPPED scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.c
> SHIPPED scripts/kconfig/lex.zconf.c
> SHIPPED scripts/kconfig/zconf.hash.c
> HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.o
> HOSTLD scripts/kconfig/conf
> scripts/kconfig/conf -o arch/x86_64/Kconfig
> *
> * Linux Kernel Configuration
> *
> *
> * General setup
> *
> [...]
> #
> # configuration written to .config
> #
> Sat Oct 27 06:43:24 CEST 2007
> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> GEN /usr/src/obj/linux/2.6.23.1/x86_64/adjusted/Makefile
> scripts/kconfig/conf -s arch/x86_64/Kconfig
> GEN /usr/src/obj/linux/2.6.23.1/x86_64/adjusted/Makefile
>From the above we can see that two make's are running in parallel here
where only one should run.
I have seen this before but only in cases where you specified several targets
on the make commandline - which you do not do in the make invocation.
Just to check it you could do a:
$(warning CMD=$(MAKECMDFLAGS)) around the place where SUBARCH is assigned in the
top-level Makefile.
Does the issue by any chance go away if you refrain from the
command && command && command && command && command && command
way of doing things?
The shell _shall_ serialize it - but..
> CHK include/linux/version.h
> UPD include/linux/version.h
> CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
> UPD include/linux/utsrelease.h
> SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-x86_64
> Using /usr/src/linux-2.6.23.1 as source for kernel
> /usr/src/linux-2.6.23.1 is not clean, please run 'make mrproper'
> in the '/usr/src/linux-2.6.23.1' directory.
> make[1]: *** [prepare3] Error 1
> make: *** [_all] Error 2
> make: INTERNAL: Exiting with 3 jobserver tokens available; should be 2!
>
>
> Which files are not clean in my situation after the command "make mrproper" was executed
> at the beginning?
If you look at the top-level Makefile you will see:
@echo ' Using $(srctree) as source for kernel'
$(Q)if [ -f $(srctree)/.config -o -d $(srctree)/include/config ]; then \
echo " $(srctree) is not clean, please run 'make mrproper'";\
echo " in the '$(srctree)' directory.";\
/bin/false; \
fi;
So you either a .config file or the config directory. Older kernels also tested
that the asm symlink in include/ was not present.
You should check that all these indeed are gone when you do "make mrproper" - you
can have been hit by a privilige issue too. But that should not be the case if
you copied the full tree to another place (and of course did not use cp -a).
You did this - yes? And the result?
>
> Which results do you or other software developers get by such test runs on kernel releases
> since "2.6.22.9-0.4-default" like it is published by SUSE now?
> ( I can build the current Linux kernel into my source directory successfully.)
If you now say this is a SUSE specific problem then I suggest asking SUSE for help.
At least I have not built a distribution kernel the last year or more - and I
do not follow what kind of patches they apply.
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists