[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710271332440.30465@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 13:32:54 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Check handling of kernel build output directory
On Oct 26 2007 21:05, Markus Elfring wrote:
>>> Aren't you supposed to use O= as described by "make help"?
>>
>> I expect that both ways should work. I find it easier to use the environment variable
>> "KBUILD_OUTPUT" because the command line parameter does not need to be repeated on each
>> make invocation.
>
>A wording correction:
>I expect that both ways should work. I find it easier to use the environment variable
>"KBUILD_OUTPUT" because it does not need to be repeated on each make invocation like it
>must happen with the command line parameter "O=".
So why not just...
export O=/foo/bar
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists