[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0710281245130.28311-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:50:13 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc: Oliver Martin <oliver.martin@...dent.tuwien.ac.at>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
USB development list <linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: USB_SUSPEND needs SUSPEND?
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, 28 October 2007 02:00, Oliver Martin wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > it seems that there is some dependency missing for CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND.
> > When I compile a kernel without CONFIG_SUSPEND, USB suspend doesn't work
> > (or at least doesn't expose its interface to userspace).
> > /sys/bus/usb/devices/.../power doesn't exist, but it is there when I
> > enable CONFIG_SUSPEND. So should CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND depend on
> > CONFIG_SUSPEND (or something selected by CONFIG_SUSPEND)?
> >
> > diff between the two configs follows, full config and dmesg for both
> > kernels is available at http://stud4.tuwien.ac.at/~e0626486/usb_suspend/
> > (though the dmesg diff doesn't seem to be all that interesting).
Actually I think the problem is the other way around. /sys/.../power
should exist whenever CONFIG_PM is defined, not just when
CONFIG_SUSPEND is enabled.
Alan Stern
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists