[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200710281948.37588.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:48:36 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Oliver Martin <oliver.martin@...dent.tuwien.ac.at>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
USB development list <linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: USB_SUSPEND needs SUSPEND?
On Sunday, 28 October 2007 17:50, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, 28 October 2007 02:00, Oliver Martin wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > it seems that there is some dependency missing for CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND.
> > > When I compile a kernel without CONFIG_SUSPEND, USB suspend doesn't work
> > > (or at least doesn't expose its interface to userspace).
> > > /sys/bus/usb/devices/.../power doesn't exist, but it is there when I
> > > enable CONFIG_SUSPEND. So should CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND depend on
> > > CONFIG_SUSPEND (or something selected by CONFIG_SUSPEND)?
> > >
> > > diff between the two configs follows, full config and dmesg for both
> > > kernels is available at http://stud4.tuwien.ac.at/~e0626486/usb_suspend/
> > > (though the dmesg diff doesn't seem to be all that interesting).
>
> Actually I think the problem is the other way around. /sys/.../power
> should exist whenever CONFIG_PM is defined, not just when
> CONFIG_SUSPEND is enabled.
Agreed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists