[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47249E8C.4070001@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 15:37:00 +0100
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>
CC: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>,
Thomas Fricaccia <thomas_fricacci@...oo.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Crispin Cowan <crispin@...spincowan.com>,
Giacomo Catenazzi <cate@...ian.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: eradicating out of tree modules
Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> Am 28.10.2007 10:25 schrieb Stefan Richter:
>> You two are hypothesizing.
>
> No, we're not. We're discussing the very real issue of whether
> LSM should be amputated in such a way as to make life difficult
> for out of tree security module developers.
I still believe you are. From what I understood, the API change had
technical reasons. (What I have read is that using security modules in
the form of loadable and unloadable kernel modules didn't make sense.)
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== =-=- ===--
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists