lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200710291522.27311.stefan.roese@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:22:27 +0100
From:	Stefan Roese <stefan.roese@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Bootup support for watchdog with short timeout (touch_nmi_watchdog()?)

I'm trying to implement support for a board specific watchdog on a PPC440EPx 
board with a very short timeout. In this case, the watchdog has to 
be "kicked" at least every 100ms, even while booting and the real watchdog 
driver not running yet. While looking for trigger places in the kernel 
source, I noticed the already existing "touch_nmi_watchdog()" function, which 
seems to be doing what I need. Even if the name not exactly matches my 
hardware setup.

My question now is, is it recommended to use this 
touch_nmi_watchdog() "infrastructure" for my PPC custom specific watchdog 
during bootup? And if yes, should it perhaps be renamed to a more generic 
name, like "touch_watchdog"?

Please advise. Thanks.

Best regards,
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ