[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071029103316.a68d00be.pj@sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:33:16 -0700
From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
Cc: clameter@....com, rientjes@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
ak@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mel@....ul.ie
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option
Lee wrote:
> I only brought it up again because now you all are considering another
> nodemask per policy.
The patch David and I are discussing will replace the
cpuset_mems_allowed nodemask in struct mempolicy, not
add a new nodemask. In other words, the meaning and
name of that existing nodemask will change, with no
change in the overall structure size.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists