linux-kernel - Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:35:42 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
Cc:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option


> 
> Another thing occurs to me:  perhaps numactl would need an additional
> 'nodes' specifier such as 'allowed'.  Alternatively, 'all' could be
> redefined to me 'all allowed'.  This is independent of how you specify
> 'all allowed' to the system call.

cpuset support in libnuma/numactl is still incomplete. I'm also
not sure what the best way to handle this is.

Probably there should be a switch for both.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/