[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200710291835.42826.ak@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:35:42 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul Jackson <pj@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option
>
> Another thing occurs to me: perhaps numactl would need an additional
> 'nodes' specifier such as 'allowed'. Alternatively, 'all' could be
> redefined to me 'all allowed'. This is independent of how you specify
> 'all allowed' to the system call.
cpuset support in libnuma/numactl is still incomplete. I'm also
not sure what the best way to handle this is.
Probably there should be a switch for both.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists