linux-kernel - Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1193680000.5035.123.camel@localhost>
Date:	Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:46:40 -0400
From:	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
To:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Cc:	clameter@....com, rientjes@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	ak@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mel@....ul.ie
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option

On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 10:33 -0700, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Lee wrote:
> > I only brought it up again because now you all are considering another
> > nodemask per policy.
> 
> The patch David and I are discussing will replace the
> cpuset_mems_allowed nodemask in struct mempolicy, not
> add a new nodemask.  In other words, the meaning and
> name of that existing nodemask will change, with no
> change in the overall structure size.


Kool!

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/