[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071030094756.779ac5c0@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 09:47:56 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ak@...e.de, rajesh.shah@...el.com,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: pci-disable-decode-of-io-memory-during-bar-sizing.patch
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:15:46 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Robert Hancock wrote:
> >
> > The other possible workaround would be to avoid using MMCONFIG
> > until the BAR sizing is done.
>
> The only sane solution is the one that people constantly seem to
> ignore:
>
> - only use MMCONFIG if absolutely required by the access itself
>
> In other words, make the MMCONFIG code fall back on old-style
> accesses for any register access to a word with reg+size <= 256.
the problem is... you're not supposed to mix both types of accesses.
> At that point, almost all the issues with mmconfig just go away,
> BECAUSE NOBODY USES IT, so it doesn't matter if it's broken?
>
> The fact is, CONF1 style accesses are just safer, and *work*.
I would suggest a slight twist then: use CONF1 *until* you're using
something above 256, and then and only then switch to MMCONFIG from
then on for all accesses.
That should solve the spec issue (yes I know about specs, but this is
one of those things that will bite us in the future if we're not
careful)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists