[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071031153422.44f864e8.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:34:22 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] af_key: suppress a warning for 64k pages.
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:08:46 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> I'm not so sure ifdef'ing things up all over the place is the way to
> solve this. It makes the code ultra ugly.
I agree.
> I think we should retain the check, but modify it so that GCC knows we
> understand that it's OK if it is always false. Perhaps a simple (u32)
> cast on the left branch of the comparison is sufficient?
Unfortunately, that does not suppress the warning (gcc is getting too
smart :-().
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists