[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071030.214219.256397507.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:42:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] af_key: suppress a warning for 64k pages.
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:34:22 +1100
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:08:46 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> > I think we should retain the check, but modify it so that GCC knows we
> > understand that it's OK if it is always false. Perhaps a simple (u32)
> > cast on the left branch of the comparison is sufficient?
>
> Unfortunately, that does not suppress the warning (gcc is getting too
> smart :-().
It seems if you break the comparison out into a function which
takes a u32, that's enough to get rid of the warning.
I can't figure out a way to make this prettier, can you?
#define PAGE_SIZE (64 * 1024)
typedef unsigned int u32;
typedef unsigned short u16;
int compare(u32 val)
{
if (val >= PAGE_SIZE)
return -1;
return 0;
}
int foo(u16 val)
{
#if 1
return compare(val);
#else
if (val >= PAGE_SIZE)
return -1;
return 0;
#endif
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists