[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4729EB88.6080408@openvz.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 18:06:48 +0300
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 17:51 +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>
>> So can we, please,
>> keep things as they are for now - the appropriate fix will be ready
>> soon.
>
> Just for the curious, could you outline on how you intend to fix this?
I have already answered to Ulrich about this. Just to
make this sub-thread consistent:
The "fix" I mention is just returning -EINVAL in case user orders
CLONE_NEWPIDS and compiling out all the namespace cloning code. This
is just a more elegant way to get rid of pid namespaces rather than
Ingo proposed.
Here's the root of the set:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/31/118
Thanks,
Pavel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists