[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4729EBA5.3080907@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:07:17 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
To: Paul Fulghum <paulkf@...rogate.com>
CC: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Char: tty, add tty_schedule_wakeup
Paul Fulghum napsal(a):
> Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> + * Functionally the same as tty_wakeup, but it can be used in hot
>> + * paths. since the wakeup is scheduled and done in the future.
>>
>
> I'm not familiar with the terminology 'hot paths',
> what do you mean by that?
Ah, thank you for the feedback, I should change this, since it seems to be
not so much descriptive.
Functionally the same as tty_wakeup, but it can be used in code, which is
expected to be fast and short (e.g. interrupt handler), since the wakeup is
scheduled and done in the future.
> Do you have an example of where you intend to
> use this new facility? The patch does not include
> such an example so it is difficult for me to see
> why you are adding this function.
I want to use it in all char drivers, which schedules a work only for
tty_wakeup() calling, because they don't want to include more code in
interrupt handlers for example (if I understand the code correctly, e.g.
n_tty discipline may invoke whole fasync machinery on tty_wakeup call).
If somebody thinks it's not needed (or it's overkill), the other approach
comes -- change all wakeup schedules with simple tty_wakeup().
thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists