lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 10:26:16 -0700 From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com> To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> Cc: rientjes@...gle.com, Lee.Schermerhorn@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...e.de Subject: Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice Christoph wrote: > The library interface can set flags to modify behavior. A library such as libnuma can set them, yes, but not everyone uses libnuma. Basically everyone uses the standard C library, glibc, which has the system call wrappers, but these wrappers should not be setting optional flags. We're going around in circles here, Christoph. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.925.600.0401 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists