linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] add_partition silently ignored errors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 2 Nov 2007 15:50:29 -0400
From:	"Bob Copeland" <me@...copeland.com>
To:	"Dirk Hohndel" <hohndel@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	"Jens Axboe" <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	"Cornelia Huck" <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
	"Andries Brouwer" <aeb@....nl>, "Al Viro" <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add_partition silently ignored errors

On 11/2/07, Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > @@ -554,8 +573,11 @@ int rescan_partitions(struct gendisk *disk, struct block_device *bdev)
> > >             if (from + size > get_capacity(disk)) {
> > >                     printk(" %s: p%d exceeds device capacity\n",
> > >                             disk->disk_name, p);
> > > +                   return -EBUSY;
[snip]
> I was wondering about that myself - EBUSY seemed to be used in a couple of
> other cases where there wasn't a clear match, but I think EOVERFLOW actually
> might make more sense. Opinions?

ISTR that some people wanted to keep going in this case rather than
return an error, e.g. for forensic purposes...

.. digging... here's a thread from last year:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/5/11/64

-Bob
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/