[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711061352520.29701@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 13:53:29 -0500 (EST)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, matthew@....cx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add the macro to test if "exactly_one_bit_set" to log2.h.
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06 2007 at 18:38 +0200, "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca> wrote:
> > While this macro is defined in terms of "is_power_of_2" and is
> > therefore functionally equivalent, the visual semantics are sometimes
> > more appropriate for what is actually being tested.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/log2.h b/include/linux/log2.h
> > index c8cf5e8..d0d324e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/log2.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/log2.h
> > @@ -55,6 +55,12 @@ bool is_power_of_2(unsigned long n)
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > + * And for folks who want slightly different semantics ...
> > + */
> > +
> > +#define exactly_one_bit_set is_power_of_2
>
> at_most_one_bit_set No?
no, it really is *exactly* one bit set. zero is not considered a
power of two.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists