[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47318298.2030903@panasas.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 11:17:12 +0200
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add the macro to test if "exactly_one_bit_set" to log2.h.
On Tue, Nov 06 2007 at 20:53 +0200, "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca> wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 06 2007 at 18:38 +0200, "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca> wrote:
>>> While this macro is defined in terms of "is_power_of_2" and is
>>> therefore functionally equivalent, the visual semantics are sometimes
>>> more appropriate for what is actually being tested.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/log2.h b/include/linux/log2.h
>>> index c8cf5e8..d0d324e 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/log2.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/log2.h
>>> @@ -55,6 +55,12 @@ bool is_power_of_2(unsigned long n)
>>> }
>>>
>>> /*
>>> + * And for folks who want slightly different semantics ...
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#define exactly_one_bit_set is_power_of_2
>> at_most_one_bit_set No?
>
> no, it really is *exactly* one bit set. zero is not considered a
> power of two.
>
> rday
Yes, Sorry for the noise it was late and I should have returned to
the kids instead of reading lkml.
Boaz
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists