[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071107165300.6eeea2d8@the-village.bc.nu>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 16:53:00 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...l.org
Subject: [PATCH] frv: Remove bogus NO_IRQ = -1 define
The old NO_IRQ define some platforms had was long ago declared obsolete
and wrong. FRV should therefore not be re-introducing this, especially as
IRQs are usually unsigned in the kernel. The "no IRQ" case is defined to be
zero and Linus made this rather clear at the time.
arch/frv shows no dependancy on this but it might show up driver fixes
needing doing I guess
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>
--- include/asm-frv//irq.h~ 2007-11-07 16:35:09.927759328 +0000
+++ include/asm-frv/irq.h 2007-11-07 16:35:09.944756744 +0000
@@ -12,9 +12,6 @@
#ifndef _ASM_IRQ_H_
#define _ASM_IRQ_H_
-/* this number is used when no interrupt has been assigned */
-#define NO_IRQ (-1)
-
#define NR_IRQS 48
#define IRQ_BASE_CPU (0 * 16)
#define IRQ_BASE_FPGA (1 * 16)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists