linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] frv: Remove bogus NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <30708.1194456502@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:28:22 +0000
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...l.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] frv: Remove bogus NO_IRQ = -1 define

Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:

> The old NO_IRQ define some platforms had was long ago declared obsolete
> and wrong. FRV should therefore not be re-introducing this, especially as
> IRQs are usually unsigned in the kernel. The "no IRQ" case is defined to be
> zero and Linus made this rather clear at the time.
> 
> arch/frv shows no dependancy on this but it might show up driver fixes
> needing doing I guess

FRV doesn't use IRQ 0, so using 0 instead is fine.

Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/