linux-kernel - Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4733113E.4090806@davidnewall.com>
Date:	Fri, 09 Nov 2007 00:08:06 +1030
From:	David Newall <david@...idnewall.com>
To:	ciol <ciol13@...il.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?

ciol wrote:
> * Do you think the megafreeze development model [1] and the "I don't 
> trust in upstream" development model are broken? (And why) 

I'm new to LKML, and because this is "my first release" I've held off 
saying that the development model scares me.  No doubt I need to see it 
through a couple of releases, minimum.  If I was less sanguine I might 
say something about how often "this is tested and ready to be pushed 
upstream" presages "the system is broken and doesn't work."  I think if 
most CIOs monitored the list they'd never let Linux anywhere near their 
business systems.  It's scary!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/