linux-kernel - Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47331CA2.9000403@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 08 Nov 2007 09:26:42 -0500
From:	Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>
To:	ciol <ciol13@...il.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?

ciol wrote:
> Hi, I'd like to ask you a few questions:
> 
> * Do you like the way linux distributions integrate the kernel?
> 
> * Wouldn't you prefer they ship with the stable and still maintained 
> 2.6.16.X, while providing optionally the latest kernel for those who 
> want or just have a new hardware?
> 
> * Do you think the megafreeze development model [1] and the "I don't 
> trust in upstream" development model are broken? (And why)

Why are you asking the developers?  We do this for the sake of the users.

	-- Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/