lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18226.39815.631891.784259@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 8 Nov 2007 16:15:51 +1100
From:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, lkml@...idb.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, drepper@...hat.com,
	mtk-manpages@....net
Subject: Re: compat_sys_times() bogus until jiffies >= 0.

David Miller writes:

> I can't see where x86 is doing this though, so perhaps for x86
> glibc does make the negative value check.  But I doubt it is
> checking the range 0x80000000-0xffffffff, otherwise mmap() would
> be busted.

At least for the INTERNAL_SYSCALL macro in glibc, the error check is:

#define INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERROR_P(val, err) \
  ((unsigned int) (val) >= 0xfffff001u)

in sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/sysdep.h.  Similarly the PSEUDO macro
in that file does a cmpl $-4095,%eax to test for error.  (There is also
a PSEUDO_NOERRNO which doesn't test for error.)

So the convention on (32-bit) x86 is that -4095 .. -1 are error
values, and other values are successful return values.

Paul.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ